chrishansenhome: (Default)
Essayist E. B. White wrote in the foreword to his collection of essays:

The essayist is a self-liberated man, sustained by the childish belief that everything he thinks about, everything that happens to him, is of general interest. … Only a person who is congenitally self-centered has the effrontery and the stamina to write essays.

("Essays of E. B. White," p vii, Harper & Row, 1977.)

Bloggers, take note! The Internet wasn't in general existence in 1977 and blogging didn't happen until the 1990's, but substitute "blogger" for "essayist", please.

I number myself in those who must take note, of course. Thanks to Canon Quirk for drawing my attention to this quote.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
I'm continuing to go backwards in my Wordpress copy of my Live Journal blog, and have gotten to mid-January 2011. Can you say "Timesuck", kiddies? A couple more observations, now that I've done nearly 7 months of renovations.

First, it not only cuts off posts at accented characters—it also cuts them off at characters like the "£" sign (useful if you're blogging from the United Kingdom) and even sometimes at single or double quotes. This last is not consistent, unfortunately. This means you have to read every single blog post. In addition, it seems to have cut off every single sermon I've posted so far. Why? Search me.

Second, the maddening thing about some special characters is that the "&" in them was changed to "&" in places, thus rendering the special character silly. I then have to delete the "amp;" and the character comes out OK.

Third, it is good to be able to correct the odd typo occasionally.

Fourth, once I've finished going through to make the thing readable, I shall have to go through it again to tag (=Wordpress "categorise") each post. Strewth!

Fifth, I don't seem to have enabled comments at any time. This is bothersome. The comments that were already there are still there; new comments are disabled. Probably not important for legacy posts, but if no one can comment on current posts why bother?

The question of "Why am I doing this?" has occurred occasionally. I guess it's better than doing nothing. I think I can do about a month or two a day for corrections, and perhaps more than that for categorisation. We will see.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
I have saved my LJ to archive, then (with very great difficulty) uploaded it to Wordpress. This new blog area is still a work in progress. However, I'm really annoyed about lots of things.

First, I use some codes in my posts to put in such things as ellipses (…) and em-dashes (—) and the like. These codes do not come out right and, in some cases (such as é) actually truncate the entry. This is majorly annoying.

Second, it seems that embedded videos are not carried across in all cases. This means that some entries end up looking really stupid, as there is a comment about the wonderful video I've embedded, and then nothing.

Third, the import facility in Wordpress says that it will take files up to 40MB. Don't believe 'em. As I got into my blogging stride I had somewhere between 3 and 4 thousand separate entries, and the whole archive couldn't be uploaded. I then split it into years, and starting in 2007 that year file was too big to upload! I had to split 2007-2010 into two pieces each in order to get them to upload. The swearing as I tried to do this was intensely annoying to HWMBO, although he hasn't said anything. I must be careful as I don't want to do anything to upset him.

Fourth, I want to automatically share my Wordpress blog with Live Journal, at least for the present. I don't know how to do this—anyone have any advice for me?

Fifth: I need a drink desperately but it's now 2315 and it's too late for that. Drat!
chrishansenhome: (Default)
A high school classmate of mine, Derek, is some sort of chemist for a pharmaceutical company. Now I know nothing about chemistry except what I have absorbed from teh Intarwebz, but his blog seems to be an interesting one. He has a post on a substance with the intriguing name of chlorine azide, which seems to be one of a family of compounds that explodes at the drop of a hat…pin. He writes very well, and even a scientific ignoramus like me can understand most of it. You might want to mosey over there in case you like it too.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
I think it's because I'm Twittering more.

I will ponder this.

Meanwhile, read the Daily Tweets and mentally expand them into a whole blog post.

Or not.

Suit yourselves.

I will try to blog more.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
If you came across the Bible section in a bookstore, you might think it was funny to take all the Bibles and reshelve them in other areas that needed evangalisation, such as Erotica, Sexuality, and the like. You might even blog about it.

Of course, if the bookstore clerk who worked in that store and found the shelf empty, suspected shoplifting (40 Bibles at a time?) and then found and returned all the Bibles to the correct shelves had a blog, she might blog too.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
A few days ago I blogged a link to an article the premise of which was that blogging can kill you. Well, ZD blogger Larry Dignan has his own take on this, and on balance, I think his take is better.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
Most of us blog for fun. The lives of those who blog for pay can be pretty unfortunate. Thanks to The Knight Shift for the heads-up.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
One of my favourite blogs is Mr Wang Says So (once Mr Wang Bakes Good Karma). Mr Wang is a very perspicacious and effective blogger who comments on the political and social situation in Singapore. His latest on the "free economy" of Singapore is here. If you want to friend him on your LiveJournals, friend him here. He's worth a read even if you only have the vaguest idea where Singapore is.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
...is here. It makes Diary of a Nobody look positively rip-roaring...
chrishansenhome: (Default)
I've met so many people who reacted the same way Dagwood and Blondie's daughter (whose name escapes me) reacted here.

Yes, I'm back, but too jetlagged to blog much. Maybe tomorrow.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
I know I have been a bad correspondent, and should probably have my lj epaulets stripped off my t-shirt and be turned out of the fort, but it's been really hectic the past few days, and we leave for Bangkok in two hours. I'm packed, but still not bathed. I will try to update when I get back, but it's difficult when you're on holiday to get your mind back to work. And keeping up your livejournal is work.
chrishansenhome: (Default)
The BBC News website had an item on blogging at work. As luck would have it, I landed on Waiter Rant. Do have a look at the entry for December 28th. It's a real hoot.

I rarely if ever mention anything about work in this place. First, because a lot of it nowadays is concerned with writing and collecting company procedures. Very dull to anyone who doesn't work for my current employer. Second, everything else is very dull too. Perhaps when I've left I'll remember something interesting and exciting and mention it. Otherwise, don't worry, you've missed nothing.

In any case, it's probably a good idea not to say much about one's work on a blog, especially if you're identifiable or the company is identifiable. Too many people have been dooced, which I understand means losing one's job through an incautious entry about your work in your blog. I can't figure out the etymology of dooce.

This week

Nov. 7th, 2004 10:44 pm
chrishansenhome: (Default)
Sorry that I haven't posted much this week. In about a year of reading various LiveJournals, I've discovered that such hiatuses can last months for some. Others can hardly pry the keys away from their fingers for a moment in order to pee or whatever else they do. This is, of course, fine. However, I've had a nagging feeling that livejournal is upset that I haven't posted. Anthropomorphising the blog server is a bad thing. I shall stop immediately.

One of the reasons I haven't been posting is, of course, the US election. I voted (absentee) for Kerry in California. When I told my sister-in-law that I was depressed about the election she said, pragmatically, "Relax: it shouldn't affect you very much." Well, I thought about that for a while, and came up with some ways in which it might actually affect me:

1) Blair may coast on John Howard's and Bush's victories and gain a third term with a large majority. This will affect my life in various ways, some good, most bad. The man has been proven economical with the truth from his own mouth (WMDs? Of course they didn't have WMDs! You mean I said they did? Well, if they'd had them, they would have used them on us, so we were morally justified in invading.) and the Opposition is incapable of opposing. The only way that Parliamentary government (as opposed to the US variety) can survive is to have a credible opposition. If no one believe the Opposition can form a government, they won't vote for them and the government will continue on and on. Viz: Margaret Thatcher. When we took this picture, the Thatcher orchids looked a bit unattractive, drab, old, and sickly. How appropriate.

2) I've found that the immigration people in the US are more and more unfriendly to me when I return for my (infrequent) visits. "What is your immigration status in the UK?" "What do you do?" "How long have you lived in the UK?" "Did you know that people who renounce their US citizenship for tax reasons are barred from returning to the US?" (This last one when I was returning to New York from a visit to Toronto, asked in Toronto Airport.) Things are not going to get any easier in the next four years.

3) Good friends and acquaintances are now in despair, hopes shattered, looking forward to 4 years of radical right-wing Republicanism ruining their relationships. (Thanks, Spiro.)

Anyway, my condolences to all those who voted otherwise last week, and my hope is that in four years the country won't be utterly ruined. I remember Richard Milhaus Nixon and his stunning victory in 1972. We were all certain that the light at the end of the tunnel was an oncoming train. But, in 1974, Watergate and some courageous elected representatives put paid to his ambitions to crown his Presidency with glory. Instead he slunk off to New Jersey because no condominium or coop in New York would have him.

Another reason is that on Wednesday, running for and catching a 188 bus, I managed to pinch the skin on the end of my left index finger between my thumbnail and middle fingernail (don't ask me how this happened: I haven't been able to duplicate it.) It bled like hell as the bus sped around the Elephant and Castle roundabout and, as everyone who's had a sore at the end of their finger will be well aware, made typing painful, especially the shotgun type of typing I'm apt to do. I only typed what was necessary. It still is a bit sore but I can type without feeling like someone is sticking a pin into the end of my index finger.

My birthday's on Monday. I'm a bit annoyed about this, but I realise that being 52 is a lot better than not being at all, so I'll just grin and bear it. I'm treating myself to a deep-tissue massage in return for some computer hardware stuff. Then HWMBO and I will go to the local Thai restaurant for dinner, although he has complained about the cost. I just smile and say, "Don't worry about it!" and that seems to work.

The other happening during the last week was the vigil in Soho for Sinders, birth name David Morley, who was beaten to death by teenagers on the South Bank as he was sitting talking to a friend early in the morning. We didn't know him (although from the reminiscences by two people who did know him he must have been someone worth knowing as he was merry and impish), but the fact that we live close to the South Bank (for the London-impaired, the South Bank is the stretch of the south bank of the Thames river stretching roughly from the Oxo Tower to Westminster Bridge, taking in Waterloo Bridge, Queen Elizabeth and Royal Festival Halls, the Heyward Gallery, the National Theatre, the National Film Theatre, Hungerford Bridges, and the London Eye) and often take strolls there when the weather is nice made it important to us that we be at the vigil.

During the afternoon I constructed sturdy candles in plastic pint glasses for us (recipe: one large church candle, cut into three pieces. Put two of the pieces in the pint glasses and then melt the third and pour the melted wax into the glasses to support the candles). We then set out for St. Anne's Church in Soho.

The church itself is late 1700's or early 1800's, I think. The back garden (not a churchyard--no burials) was open until recently. A fence was constructed as street people and drug addicts were making the garden their home. It is fearsome: it looks like something to keep the inmates of Cell Block H in. It's concavely curved (to keep people from climbing up it, I presume) and lit by garish-coloured lights. Anyway, it wasn't open until 6 so we wandered to Old Compton Street and looked at the crowds outside the Admiral Duncan pub who were also waiting for the garden to open. Various people of all types were carrying flowers (our candles were an exception, it seems) and reminiscing about Sinders. he had been the bar manager of the Admiral Duncan when the nailbomb blew up the pub several years ago. He suffered burns, but three people died from the effects of the blast. The perpetrator was caught and sentenced to life, but Sinders never recovered his composure. A group of Asian teenagers brought a condolence card to the pub after it had reopened (a bomb also went off on Brick Lane, the centre of the Bangladeshi and Pakistani community in London) and Sinders burst into tears, he was so touched. He had flashbacks about the blast, and found it so difficult to carry on at the Admiral Duncan that he was moved to be manager of another pub owned by the same brewery.

Anyway, at the advertised time (6 pm, for a 6:30 start) we went back to the garden and, surprise, surprise! Nothing was ready. At about 6:20 or so the gates were opened and we trooped in. We were almost in the front row. However, 6:30 came and went, various people were making announcements to the effect of "It'll only be a few moments now", but it didn't start until about 6:50. As it ended up we were standing for about an hour. The functionaries who were announcing also told people to turn their mobile phones off. Of course, many did not and there was merry hell breaking loose for a while as phones rang and announcements to turn them off followed. The place was packed. The streets outside were packed and loudspeakers had to be used so that everyone could hear what was going on. The Vicar (a woman) gave a good non-denominational talk about the meaning of the service, the Mayor's representative spoke, and the London Gay Men's Chorus sang. A piper piped Sinders out to "A Gaelic Air". A busker who was a friend of Sinders' sang something he himself had whipped up. We dutifully sang along. Finally, we dispersed. HWMBO and I laid our candles in the garden, still burning. Most everyone else had taken candles from the management: they were small votive lights that had not survived the delay in starting the service.

We thousands gathered together to celebrate the life of someone only a fraction of us knew. However, almost any of us could have been sitting on that bench that night, talking with a friend. Until the chain of homophobia is utterly broken and children learn acceptance and respect for those different from them, we will gather again and again for these services. But, having been a child and the butt of bullying from other children, I know firsthand how evil, rotten, and nasty some children can be in dealing with other children who are different. I hold out little hope that children can learn to accept rather than to exclude. Their elders are giving a pretty good example of the latter nowadays.

October 2019

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 10:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios