Today's journalistic faux pas
May. 2nd, 2006 06:21 pmFrom this story, in and of itself somewhat out-of-the ordinary (about a 104-year-old woman marrying a 33-year-old man [his first marriage, her 21st]), comes this paragraph:
Malaysian Muslim men are allowed by their religion to take up to four wives at a time, but reports of women who marry more than once are rare. Muslim women do not practice polygamy.
I was not living with the illusion that any Muslim women married more than one woman at a time. Obviously the reporter knows something the rest of us do not.
Malaysian Muslim men are allowed by their religion to take up to four wives at a time, but reports of women who marry more than once are rare. Muslim women do not practice polygamy.
I was not living with the illusion that any Muslim women married more than one woman at a time. Obviously the reporter knows something the rest of us do not.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-02 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-02 08:47 pm (UTC)if the verb "practicing polygamy" is parallel to "marry" then are not A+B+C+D practicing polygamy?
But that doesn't work with the quoted paragraph either, since "muslim women don't practice polygamy" implies that they don't get involved in such relationships. Which plainly they do, as the 104yr old woman demonstrates.
the only way I can parse the quoted text to be consistent is if the 104yr old lady is not a muslim, but has married a muslim man.
didn't dr johnson say something about second (third, fourth... 21st) marriage being the triumph of hope over experience?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-02 10:38 pm (UTC)Oh, and from the article itself we find that the woman is Muslim, as one of the man's stated reasons for marrying her was to learn Muslim religious tenets from her.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-02 10:33 pm (UTC)Muslim women do not practice polyandry.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 07:11 am (UTC)but I still don't have an answer to my earlier question (and I really don't know the answer to this): what are the several wives of a man who is practicing polygamy doing? surely ann and betty and cathy and donna are involved in polygamy when they simultaneously are married to john. (and shirley too, if she joins the party)
is this a verb that only goes one way? only the male to the female? what are the females doing? being objects of polygamy? that sounds vaguely like a transitive verb.
-- poozled in trawna
no subject
Date: 2006-05-03 10:32 am (UTC)What they are called in total is not something I happen to know. A harem, I suppose, might be an appropriate term.
As I'm not likely to be married to several women at a time, the question and answer are academic.