![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
- 07:46 @jerricklim lots of Ugly Angmohs around...we see 'em here & try to export 'em. The Ugly American is a stock character in travel writing. #
- 10:44 My orthodontist is pleased:RT DentonPolice: twitpic.com/hrf91 - 09/14/2009 | 18 yrs | ESCAPED FROM CUSTODY #
- 14:45 @mheusser I am a Freemason and if the law were to be broken in our Lodge, I would be honour-bound to report it to the authorities. #
- 17:15 @urbanbohemian turn in your Queer Card[TM] immediately! #
- 17:34 have been cleaning house, installing software, and generally away from teh intarwebz this afternoon. Have y'all been playing nice meanwhile? #
- 19:00 @cemab4y congratulations! Safe journey and then safe working. #
- 19:30 @legalmoose Seven years? That must be some sort of record. Rivals Jarndyce v. Jarndyce. #
- 22:23 @GaySkyHooker if you're interested in sounding I have a friend who is good at it in NYC and will pass your email address to him if you wish. #
- 22:27 @Naoij i'm sorry to hear it. my condolences. i will keep your grandpa and your family and you in my thoughts and prayers. #
- 23:10 @GaySkyHooker done. he's coming to London on Thursday so I can talk to him about it. #
Sep. 16th, 2009
From Twitter 09-15-2009
Sep. 16th, 2009 03:01 am- 07:46:16: @jerricklim lots of Ugly Angmohs around...we see 'em here & try to export 'em. The Ugly American is a stock character in travel writing.
- 10:44:12: My orthodontist is pleased:RT DentonPolice: http://twitpic.com/hrf91 - 09/14/2009 | 18 yrs | ESCAPED FROM CUSTODY
- 14:45:03: @mheusser I am a Freemason and if the law were to be broken in our Lodge, I would be honour-bound to report it to the authorities.
- 17:15:38: @urbanbohemian turn in your Queer Card[TM] immediately!
- 17:34:08: have been cleaning house, installing software, and generally away from teh intarwebz this afternoon. Have y'all been playing nice meanwhile?
- 19:00:10: @cemab4y congratulations! Safe journey and then safe working.
- 19:30:14: @legalmoose Seven years? That must be some sort of record. Rivals Jarndyce v. Jarndyce.
- 22:23:33: @GaySkyHooker if you're interested in sounding I have a friend who is good at it in NYC and will pass your email address to him if you wish.
- 22:27:11: @Naoij i'm sorry to hear it. my condolences. i will keep your grandpa and your family and you in my thoughts and prayers.
- 23:10:00: @GaySkyHooker done. he's coming to London on Thursday so I can talk to him about it.
Tweets copied by twittinesis.com
Today I was interviewed by a market researcher cum ethnographer. You may remember that a month or so ago I was filling out a questionnaire on my media habits, as well as keeping a diary of what I was watching on TV, listening to on radio, or surfing online—I left out the naughty bits of that. Well, a few days ago I got a phone call that they found my diary so interesting that they wanted to do a more in-depth interview in my home, for which I would receive a honorarium. Well, in my current unemployed state, honorarium was music to my aures, so I agreed. The interviewer came to the house today and we spoke for three hours, most of which conversation she was filming and recording.
She was a young lady who seemed a bit disorganised. When she came to the door I asked her for ID, since she was someone I didn't know who was going to be in the house. She had no ID. She scrabbled through her bags for a business card, which she failed to find. After a few minutes she offered a credit card with her name and her company's name on it. I accepted that, and hope that she's learned her lesson. She sat on the sofa and got her video camera adjusted.
She was quite interested in the house—she asked many questions about my favourite places in the house—did I enjoy my easy chair in the living room more than sitting at my computer? What kinds of TV shows did I watch? Why did I only listen to BBC Radio 4 among the UK radio stations on offer?
In the middle of the interview Daring Squirrel came to the window for her lunch. The interviewer was surprised when I started feeding the squirrel, and filmed that along with everything else.
At the end of the interview I went through the channels on our internet radio: everything from Radio 4 to Radio Australia and Radio New Zealand, with a large number of US news radio stations in various cities and WKCR and WQXR in New York. She put her camera together again and recorded me talking her through the radio.
Afterwards I reflected about the questions she asked me. I find it difficult to believe that there is anyone else in the UK whose media habits are like mine. We hardly ever watch BBC or commercial terrestrial television. I use the iPlayer for radio, but rarely or never use it to time-shift programs I've missed. I listen to internet radio stations that couldn't be heard here over the air. I read the Grauniad …er… Guardian, the Economist (when Royal Mail deigns to deliver it), Private Eye, the Church Times and New Scientist. Not your usual reading material, to be sure.
As for my online habits—since the advent of Twitter and Facebook, my online activity has changed utterly. I used to blog relatively frequently, even if it were only a blog entry titled "Today's XXX URL:" where XXX would be something funny, or sad, or notable for the day. Nowadays, I tweet such things, and they appear in my blog only when my Twitter aggregator publishes it there at the end of the day. I follow Facebook, republish non @-directed tweets there, and generally keep up with people in that space. I occasionally (but not as often as I used to) use MSN or Yahoo! Messenger to communicate with people. I read my Live Journal Friends page every day. I keep up with emails and email lists, but don't reply to the lists as often as I once did.
What does this all mean? Am I weird? Out-of-touch? Not acting my age, but acting my shoe size? (Size 9 UK/10 US, if you must know…)
It is very telling that she was relatively uninterested in my iPhone, although she filmed it. She was quite interested in our wireless Skype phone and our various computers. I am very surprised that she wasn't interested in the iPhone, as I believe that the iP(hone/od Touch) will be a major delivery venue for the media of the future.
She asked me what the BBC or TV in general could do to get me interested in watching TV again. I thought for a long time and said, "Nothing, really." As for the license fee, I said that it has made the BBC complacent, fat, and sassy. The best thing for the BBC would be for the license fee to be abolished and the BBC have to support itself through advertising or subscription fees (easy to collect when all terrestrial TV broadcasting is ended and only Freeview, Virgin, or Sky carry the BBC). I know that's not a totally popular view, but most of the BBC output these days is aimed at the lowest common denominator in British society. Since everyone pays the license fee, there must be programs for everyone from the booboisie to the monarchy—which are sometimes the same—and from academics to illiterates.
Yesterday I listened to Sir Terry Wogan on Radio 2—since he's about to retire, and is a British Institution, I thought I ought to listen at least once. His program seguéd into the next one and that announcer sounded the same as Sir Terry. Americans do the Morning-Drive-Time-Chat-Show-With-Music-News-and-Traffic much better. I mentioned all this to the interviewer, and explained why I almost exclusively listen to Radio 4. My comment in the diary about how bad Radio 4 comedy in general has gotten was interesting to her, and I expanded on why I think comedy shows like Cabin Pressure are junk.
So that's it. I don't know much about how it is to be used. I think that the client is the BBC, and it will be quite interesting to see whether there is any further contact or research done with me.
She was a young lady who seemed a bit disorganised. When she came to the door I asked her for ID, since she was someone I didn't know who was going to be in the house. She had no ID. She scrabbled through her bags for a business card, which she failed to find. After a few minutes she offered a credit card with her name and her company's name on it. I accepted that, and hope that she's learned her lesson. She sat on the sofa and got her video camera adjusted.
She was quite interested in the house—she asked many questions about my favourite places in the house—did I enjoy my easy chair in the living room more than sitting at my computer? What kinds of TV shows did I watch? Why did I only listen to BBC Radio 4 among the UK radio stations on offer?
In the middle of the interview Daring Squirrel came to the window for her lunch. The interviewer was surprised when I started feeding the squirrel, and filmed that along with everything else.
At the end of the interview I went through the channels on our internet radio: everything from Radio 4 to Radio Australia and Radio New Zealand, with a large number of US news radio stations in various cities and WKCR and WQXR in New York. She put her camera together again and recorded me talking her through the radio.
Afterwards I reflected about the questions she asked me. I find it difficult to believe that there is anyone else in the UK whose media habits are like mine. We hardly ever watch BBC or commercial terrestrial television. I use the iPlayer for radio, but rarely or never use it to time-shift programs I've missed. I listen to internet radio stations that couldn't be heard here over the air. I read the Grauniad …er… Guardian, the Economist (when Royal Mail deigns to deliver it), Private Eye, the Church Times and New Scientist. Not your usual reading material, to be sure.
As for my online habits—since the advent of Twitter and Facebook, my online activity has changed utterly. I used to blog relatively frequently, even if it were only a blog entry titled "Today's XXX URL:" where XXX would be something funny, or sad, or notable for the day. Nowadays, I tweet such things, and they appear in my blog only when my Twitter aggregator publishes it there at the end of the day. I follow Facebook, republish non @-directed tweets there, and generally keep up with people in that space. I occasionally (but not as often as I used to) use MSN or Yahoo! Messenger to communicate with people. I read my Live Journal Friends page every day. I keep up with emails and email lists, but don't reply to the lists as often as I once did.
What does this all mean? Am I weird? Out-of-touch? Not acting my age, but acting my shoe size? (Size 9 UK/10 US, if you must know…)
It is very telling that she was relatively uninterested in my iPhone, although she filmed it. She was quite interested in our wireless Skype phone and our various computers. I am very surprised that she wasn't interested in the iPhone, as I believe that the iP(hone/od Touch) will be a major delivery venue for the media of the future.
She asked me what the BBC or TV in general could do to get me interested in watching TV again. I thought for a long time and said, "Nothing, really." As for the license fee, I said that it has made the BBC complacent, fat, and sassy. The best thing for the BBC would be for the license fee to be abolished and the BBC have to support itself through advertising or subscription fees (easy to collect when all terrestrial TV broadcasting is ended and only Freeview, Virgin, or Sky carry the BBC). I know that's not a totally popular view, but most of the BBC output these days is aimed at the lowest common denominator in British society. Since everyone pays the license fee, there must be programs for everyone from the booboisie to the monarchy—which are sometimes the same—and from academics to illiterates.
Yesterday I listened to Sir Terry Wogan on Radio 2—since he's about to retire, and is a British Institution, I thought I ought to listen at least once. His program seguéd into the next one and that announcer sounded the same as Sir Terry. Americans do the Morning-Drive-Time-Chat-Show-With-Music-News-and-Traffic much better. I mentioned all this to the interviewer, and explained why I almost exclusively listen to Radio 4. My comment in the diary about how bad Radio 4 comedy in general has gotten was interesting to her, and I expanded on why I think comedy shows like Cabin Pressure are junk.
So that's it. I don't know much about how it is to be used. I think that the client is the BBC, and it will be quite interesting to see whether there is any further contact or research done with me.
Thunderbird redux
Sep. 16th, 2009 06:38 pmAnother blog entry! It never rains but it pours.
I have been using Thunderbird for a few weeks now. I'm pretty well used to it, and found only a couple of things annoying. I found the solution to one annoying thing today, hurrah!
When an email with images in it is opened, unless the sender is in my address book, Thunderbird, "to protect my privacy", asks me whether I want to show images. Well, MailWasher Pro protects my privacy pretty well, so I've been putting all the senders in my address book.
However, some senders vary their email addresses with every email: one information aggregator emailer, for example, gives an email address of, say "mail.asdflkjhqweriouyasdjsdflkjh@…" one time, and "mail.cxbmnsdfgljhxmnzxlasdflihjxbmnvz@…" the next. The random character part is varied each time. Thunderbird was asking me to add each one of these "addresses" whenever the aggregator sent me an email. I was quite annoyed.
There is, however, a way to tell Thunderbird to always show images, but they don't want you to do it (and blame them for any privacy violations, I suppose). I discovered it and changed the parameter, and lo! no more questions about showing images.
A small victory, but a very useful one for me. Now to try to get it to contract subfolders after I move an email into one.
I have been using Thunderbird for a few weeks now. I'm pretty well used to it, and found only a couple of things annoying. I found the solution to one annoying thing today, hurrah!
When an email with images in it is opened, unless the sender is in my address book, Thunderbird, "to protect my privacy", asks me whether I want to show images. Well, MailWasher Pro protects my privacy pretty well, so I've been putting all the senders in my address book.
However, some senders vary their email addresses with every email: one information aggregator emailer, for example, gives an email address of, say "mail.asdflkjhqweriouyasdjsdflkjh@…" one time, and "mail.cxbmnsdfgljhxmnzxlasdflihjxbmnvz@…" the next. The random character part is varied each time. Thunderbird was asking me to add each one of these "addresses" whenever the aggregator sent me an email. I was quite annoyed.
There is, however, a way to tell Thunderbird to always show images, but they don't want you to do it (and blame them for any privacy violations, I suppose). I discovered it and changed the parameter, and lo! no more questions about showing images.
A small victory, but a very useful one for me. Now to try to get it to contract subfolders after I move an email into one.
RIP Henry Gibson
Sep. 16th, 2009 09:19 pmSo farewell, then/Henry Gibson;
You used to be
in Laugh-In.
We'd sit there and watch you
with your flower and your line
"A poem...
by Henry Gibson"
But now you've recited
your last poem.
And we can say that
you're now on "Laugh-Out".
by E.J. Thribb, age 98-3/4
You used to be
in Laugh-In.
We'd sit there and watch you
with your flower and your line
"A poem...
by Henry Gibson"
But now you've recited
your last poem.
And we can say that
you're now on "Laugh-Out".
by E.J. Thribb, age 98-3/4